WASHINGTON: President Joe Biden said Wednesday he would stop US weapon supplies to the Zionist entity if it attacks Rafah in southern Gaza, his most direct warning to date over the prosecution of the war against Hamas. In an interview with CNN Biden also deplored the fact that civilians had been killed by the dropping of US bombs on the Palestinian territory.

His fresh warning came after the US last week halted a shipment of huge American bombs to the Zionist entity as it appeared ready to proceed with a major attack on Rafah -- a city packed with Palestinian civilians sheltering near the Egyptian border. “If they go into Rafah, I’m not supplying the weapons that have been used... to deal with the cities,” Biden said. “We’re not gonna supply the weapons and the artillery shells that have been used.”

Biden, a self-described Zionist, had long resisted stopping any of the $3 billion in weapons the United States sends each year to the Zionist entity -- and pushed Congress for an increase in the wake of the October 7 attack by Hamas that triggered the major Zionist retaliation. But US officials say privately that his hand was forced after Zionist Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made clear he would go ahead with an assault on Rafah, defying Biden’s public appeals to spare the city.

Under increasing pressure from the left of his own party to limit arms shipments, the Biden administration paused delivery last week of 1,800 2,000-pound (907 kilogram) bombs and 1,700 500-pound bombs. “Civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs,” Biden said. “It’s just wrong.” Biden may worry about alienating centrist voters if he shifts too far, while Netanyahu knows he needs US support at a time of wide global anger against the Zionist entity. “We’re not walking away from Zionist’s security,” Biden insisted in the CNN interview. “We’re walking away from the Zionist’s ability to wage war in those areas.”

Incremental pressure

The Biden administration has previously taken smaller steps to show displeasure with Netanyahu, including imposing sanctions on extremist Zionist settlers and letting through a UN Security Council resolution that supported a ceasefire. Major US interventions in the past have changed Zionist behavior. In 1991, the Zionist entity begrudgingly attended the Madrid conference that led to a peace process with the Palestinians after then-president George W. Bush held up US loan guarantees to build settlements.

In 1956, heavy US pressure including economic threats forced the Zionist entity as well as Britain and France to give up their grab of the Suez Canal from Egypt. But experts questioned if the Zionist entity could be persuaded this time as it sees its war in existential terms after October 7, the deadliest attack ever on the country. “I cannot imagine American displeasure with the prospect of a Rafah invasion doesn’t loom large in the Zionist government’s calculus,” said Jon Alterman, senior vice president at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “At the same time, Zionists have other calculations, too,” he said.

Will the Zionist entity listen?

Raphael Cohen, director of the strategy and doctrine program at the RAND Corporation research group, noted that the Zionist entity dialed back air strikes and opened border crossings after Biden voiced anger last month following a Zionist strike that killed seven aid workers. “Despite Netanyahu’s rhetoric, the Zionist entity takes American pressure quite seriously,” he said. But avoiding a Rafah invasion “functionally means leaving at least four battalions of Hamas fighters plus its senior leadership intact and over 100 hostages in Hamas hands,” he said.

“From a Zionist entity strategic perspective, that’s probably a nonstarter and it also may fracture Netanyahu’s coalition.” Even with the pause of US shipments, the Zionist entity is believed to have a significant weapons stockpile. It has a major domestic defense industry and the Biden administration has repeatedly shipped weapons that fall beneath the threshold for congressional notification. Ari Tolany, who follows the arms trade for the progressive Center for International Policy, doubted the halt would have “an immediate operational impact” but said it sent a message to the (Zionist entity) not to drop 2,000-pound bombs, as it already has in the war. — AFP