ShareSRINAGAR, India: One of the most comprehensive NGO reports on decades of violence and killings in Indian-administered Kashmir is Alleged Perpetrators, published by the most respected rights group in the disputed region. But clicking on the Greater Kashmir newspaper report it cites in the killing of a 16-year-old named Ishtiyaq Ahmad Khanday and two other people now generates a “404 Oops... Page not found!” error.
For Sajad Ahmad Dar, who died in hospital after being in police custody in 2012, the Kashmir Reader link says: “Sorry the page you were looking is not here.” And for Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Malik, shot 19 times when paramilitaries searched his house, the My Kashmir page reads simply: “Forbidden. You don’t have permission to access this resource.”
And so on, over and over again. In recent months hundreds of reports chronicling decades of violence in the disputed Muslim-majority territory have disappeared from local media archives or been rendered unsearchable through a variety of methods.
Critics say it is an Orwellian effort to expunge history and control the narrative going forward, with most pointing the finger at the Indian government. In many cases, newspaper reports are the only publicly-accessible primary-source records of events in Kashmir.
“It’s still very mysterious how the archives disappeared and why,” Anuradha Bhasin, executive editor of the influential Kashmir Times daily, told AFP. “There are reasons to believe-though these are just suspicions-that somebody from the state could be complicit in this,” she said.
Control of Kashmir has been contested between India and Pakistan since independence in 1947, and the nuclear-armed neighbours have fought two of their three wars over the territory. India has at least half a million soldiers permanently deployed on its side of the frontier, fighting a long-running insurgency that has claimed tens of thousands of lives since 1989. Delhi accuses Pakistan of backing the militants, which Islamabad denies.
Tensions intensified in 2019 after New Delhi rescinded the limited autonomy guaranteed to Kashmir under the Indian constitution and imposed direct rule, detained thousands of people including political leaders and activists in a huge security clampdown. It also cut phone lines and internet relays in what eventually became the world’s longest communications blackout.
After connections were restored, journalists began noticing that swathes of reporting were missing from their publications’ websites. Speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisal, one editor in the main city of Srinagar told AFP that at first they thought it was a technical issue.
“But after a closer look into our online archives we realised that it was mostly of previous years of mass uprising and killings that were missing,” they said, in a pattern that made it seem “as if nothing had happened in Kashmir before 2019”. Many of the vanished reports cover huge demonstrations against Indian rule in 2008, 2010 and 2016, when in total nearly 300 protesters were killed by government forces and thousands more injured, including women and children.
Historian Siddiq Wahid, the founding Vice Chancellor of the Islamic University of Science and Technology in Pulwama, called the purge a “diabolical” attempt to ensure “only one interpretation” of events was possible. “It’s an extraordinary effort to seize the narrative, in the sense that there should only be one narrative and that there should only be an official history,” he told AFP. “Orwell’s depiction of surveillance that was done in ‘1984’ looks crude and primitive compared to what is happening today.”
‘Impossible to search’
India’s government spokesperson in Srinagar did not respond to repeated requests by AFP for comment on this story. In the past Indian authorities have regularly dismissed rights groups’ accusations of abuse and UN reports as propaganda intended to defame government forces deployed in the territory.
Several media personnel, speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the subject, said authorities had pressured their publications into hiding past reporting on killings, rape and torture blamed on Indian security forces.
One website manager working across several newspapers said counterinsurgency police repeatedly demanded he share technical details about websites he helped maintain.
Another Srinagar newspaper editor said publishers had been coerced by authorities into hiding reporting on sensitive topics by scrubbing metadata from online stories. Metadata is information used to classify digital content and helps search engines find relevant results. - AFP
