close
BERLIN: Britain's PM Keir Starmer (center) poses with CEO of Siemens Energy Christian Bruch (left) and Vice President Darren Davidson as he visits the Siemens Energy plant in Berlin on Aug 28, 2024. – AFP
BERLIN: Britain's PM Keir Starmer (center) poses with CEO of Siemens Energy Christian Bruch (left) and Vice President Darren Davidson as he visits the Siemens Energy plant in Berlin on Aug 28, 2024. – AFP

UK reshapes its AI strategy under pressure to cut costs

LONDON: Britain’s Labour government is drawing up a new, cost-cutting artificial intelligence strategy ahead of a crunch autumn budget – prioritizing public sector adoption of the technology over direct investment into industry. Since taking office in July, Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government has been reviewing the costs of AI. It has already scrapped a planned 1.3 billion pounds’ ($1.72 billion) worth of investment in related technologies - drawn up by the previous Conservative government - including an 800 million pound investment promised to develop a supercomputer at the University of Edinburgh.

While 1.3 billion pounds is a relatively small sum in the wider AI landscape, Starmer’s government faced backlash from industry leaders who said it signals that Britain is becoming less interested in supporting innovation. By comparison France, which is building a reputation as a European hub for generative AI, recently committed 2.5 billion euros ($2.77 billion) to invest in developing the technology domestically. The British government is also considering scrapping a planned San Francisco office for its AI Safety Institute, according to one source close to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT). The office was originally due to open over the summer, and would have seen staff hired in line with market rates, estimated at upwards of $100,000 each.

“Labour always needs to somehow look different to the Tories, and reining in the AI safety stuff, the focus on existential risks, is an easy way to do that,” the source said. Signaling a change of direction, tech minister Peter Kyle in July sacked one of the co-founders of the AI Safety Institute, Nitarshan Rajkumar, from his role as a senior policy adviser, according to three sources close to the DSIT.

While it is not unusual for a new administration to bring in its own advisers, some in the industry see the sacking as an unforced error. Rajkumar announced his departure from DSIT on social media platform X, but did not say his contract had been terminated. “Huge loss to the UK civil service,” Jordan Sullivan, of lobby group Startup Coalition, wrote on X shortly after. “Just the sort of person we should be doing a huge amount to keep inside the tent.”

Around the same time, Labour recruited Matt Clifford, a tech entrepreneur and chief organizer of last year’s AI Safety Summit under Conservative leader Rishi Sunak, to devise a new strategy. Clifford is expected to deliver the plan in September, the source said, ahead of the government’s Autumn Statement the following month. A government spokesperson said it recognized the transformative power of AI and remained committed to harnessing the technology to deliver growth and create opportunities for people across the UK. Tech minister Kyle aims to drive AI adoption in the public sector as a means of improving efficiency and reducing costs, while cutting back the government’s direct investments into industry, according to the three sources.

Britain hosted the world’s first AI Safety Summit in Bletchley Park last November, drawing world leaders like Kamala Harris and tech moguls such as Elon Musk and Sam Altman. Fears around AI’s catastrophic potential spread after Microsoft-backed OpenAI released ChatGPT to the public in November 2022, but these need to be balanced against the technology’s positive aspects.  — Reuters

Two images stand out, marring the beauty of the country. The first concerns an initiative launched by Sabah Al-Ahmad Maritime City in Khairan. Although this initiative had the potential to become a shining example for Kuwait, it fell short - a commo...
By Hussain Sana In 1956, Britain, France and the Zionist entity launched a coordinated attack on Egypt following its sovereign decision to nationalize the Suez Canal. The operation, codenamed “Musketeer”, was the result of a proven conspiracy. T...
MORE STORIES